The Government and Hash - The Saga Continues Experts Urge House of Lords to Postpone Cannabis Reclassification (Guardian) Today the House of Lords debates the proposal from the Home Office to reclassify cannabis from class C to class B. In recommending this change to parliament, the government has rejected the explicit advice of its appointed experts, the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, for the first time in nearly 30 years. In its last report, produced at the request of the home secretary, the ACMD clearly recommended - for the third time in the last six years - that cannabis remains a class C drug, and did so after examining all the available and latest evidence on short- and long-term health risks, as well as social harms, public attitudes and policing priorities. After setting out its conclusions on the health risks of cannabis and concerns regarding greater potency, the report made clear recommendations for improved drugs education and greater efforts to tackle drug dealing. However, it concluded that the evidence was against greater criminalisation of possession. The impact of parliament agreeing to the government's policy could be very damaging. Cannabis use has fallen in recent years, especially following its downgrading to class C in 2004, and it is obviously unwise to risk reversing that trend. The classification system must be credible - reclassification would send out an ambiguous message about the dangers of current class B drugs. Even more importantly, the move would be a sad departure from the welcome trend - established after the Phillips report into the BSE disaster - of public policy following expert scientific advice unless there is new evidence. Baroness Meacher has tabled an amendment calling for a postponement of any reclassification pending a further ACMD review in two years. We urge peers to maintain the trend to evidence-based policy-making by supporting the amendment. Dr Evan Harris MP Lib Dem science spokesman, David King Former government chief scientific adviser, Professor Michael Rawlins Chair, ACMD 1998-2008, (Lord) Robert May Former government chief scientific adviser, Phil Willis MP Chair, Science select committee, Professor Gabriel Horne Chair, Academy of Medical Science working group on addiction, Professor Colin Blakemore Member, UK Drug Policy Commission; former director, Medical Research Council, Tracey Brown Director, Sense about Science, Dr Leslie King Member, ACMD, Ruth Runciman Former member, ACMD --- Tuesday November 25 2008 *Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2008/nov/25/drugs-alcohol-cannabis ____________________________________________________ Scientists attack plan to upgrade cannabis Ian Sample, science correspondent guardian.co.uk, Tuesday November 25 2008 00.01 GMT The Guardian, Tuesday November 25 2008 Article history Government plans to overrule its own drug advisers and reclassify cannabis as a more dangerous substance are attacked by leading scientists and MPs in a letter to the Guardian today. The home secretary, Jacqui Smith, intends to move cannabis from class C to class B, where it will sit alongside amphetamines, such as speed, and barbiturates. The move comes despite repeated recommendations from the government's drug advisers that its classification should not be upgraded. The proposal, which is due to be voted on by peers today, is described as "extremely damaging" in the letter, whose signatories include two former chief scientists, Sir David King and Lord May; Professor Colin Blakemore, former head of the Medical Research Council; and Sir Gabriel Horn, chair of the Academy of Medical Science's working group on brain science, addiction and drugs. The letter warns that changing the classification of cannabis risks reversing a downwards trend in use of the drug since 2004 and undermines public health messages about the more serious dangers of class B drugs. It urges peers to block the change of classification by voting to defer the move until 2010. "In recommending this change to parliament the government has rejected the explicit advice of its appointed experts, the advisory council on the misuse of drugs, for the first time in its history," the experts write. The Lib Dem science spokesman Evan Harris said the letter demonstrated the anger in the science community over the government's treatment of expert scientific advice. "It may be that it will take resignations in order for ministers to understand that they can't ignore the evidence and keep scientists on board," he said. The government's advisory council on misuse of drugs (ACMD) has reviewed the classification of cannabis three times since 2002. Its most recent report, which was commissioned last July amid concerns that highly potent "skunk" was becoming widely available, found that while stronger homegrown strains of the drug dominated the market there was only weak evidence of a link with mental illnesses, such as schizophrenia. The report called for tougher action against cannabis farms, a crackdown on shops selling cannabis paraphernalia and a renewed public health campaign. Scientists on the council warned that reclassifying cannabis was unlikely to curb usage, but risked increasing the chances of vulnerable people getting a criminal record. In a last-ditch attempt to block the Lords from approving the government's plans, Baroness Meacher has tabled an amendment that would postpone a decision on the drug for two years, pending another review by the ACMD. In May Smith told the Commons that she had to take public perceptions and the pressures on policing into account when making a final decision on cannabis. - - Source again: http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2008/nov/25/drugs-alcohol-medical-research-society
This is the bit I fucking hate. What we have here are logical, rational thoughts from people who consequently went into the fields of science, against conservative fucking puritan arseholes who for those reasons decided to be lying, controlling MP's who want to stop any sort of positive progression (on various issues) for a whole host of "for their own interest" reasons. This is what annoys me about the drug war, these people quite frankly haven't got a fucking clue, not one bit. They know nothing about drugs apart from stigmatized crap (and don't care anyway), totally disregarding their own Advisory Council who actually do have the knowledge to make these desicions, yet the government call the shots. There has been quite a bit more kicking off between the two in relation to this recently, I'll post the links later. They want to downgrade ecstasy to Class B and have the power to operate separately, against government rule like all the others are allowed to. Unfortunately, they know it would lose them a lot of votes, because the majority of the country haven't got a clue either. Misinformation breeds ignorance and ignorance is bliss. We have a lot of ignorant people.
Oh and also, this might have something to do with it. This is a must read. It's about a parasite that is transmitted by cats and causes neurological changes in the brains of animals/mammals and can alter their behavior. [ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toxoplasma_gondii"]Toxoplasma gondii - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia@@AMEPARAM@@/wiki/File:Toxoplasma_gondii_tachy.jpg" class="image"><img alt="" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/39/Toxoplasma_gondii_tachy.jpg"@@AMEPARAM@@commons/3/39/Toxoplasma_gondii_tachy.jpg[/ame] [ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroticism"]Neuroticism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/ame] and then check this bit, it's no wonder loads of people are stupid: It is estimated that between 30% and 65% of all people worldwide are infected with Toxoplasmosis. However, there is large variation countries: in France, for example, around 88% of the population are carriers, probably due to a high consumption of raw and lightly cooked meat. Germany, the Netherlands and Brazil also have high prevalences of around 80%, over 80% and 67% respectively. In Britain, about 22% are carriers, and South Korea’s rate is only 4.3% http://www.seedmagazine.com/news/2006/08/the_cultureshaping_parasite.php?page=all&p=y
